Why we are building this

We are two academicians building the teaching aids we always wished our own labs had. We are at the idea stage, based in Bengaluru, and not yet incorporated.

The problem

  • Thin data

    Paper-pencil tests and analog apparatus capture a single score per item: a tick, a count, a stopwatch time.

  • Old equipment

    Many labs still run on wood-and-metal kits such as the memory drum, tachistoscope and steadiness tester.

  • Priced out of modern tools

    Imported psychophysiology teaching systems are priced per station, beyond what most department budgets allow.

  • Procedure over science

    Checkbox and keypress responses teach procedure, not the science of measuring behaviour.

A fourth way to measure

Each earlier way of measuring added precision. Sensors add new kinds of data, and let participants respond the way people actually react.

  1. Paper and pencil

    Questionnaires, inventories and paper tasks.

    Captures a tick or a total score

  2. Analog apparatus

    Mirror drawing, memory drum, chronoscope.

    Captures a counter or stopwatch reading

  3. Computerised tasks

    Task software and online test batteries.

    Captures keypress reaction time and accuracy

  4. Sensor-native devices

    Infrared, facial-response, GSR and EEG sensing.

    Captures movement, face, skin and brain signals

  • Move, don't click

    Reach towards or away from a target. Onset and hesitation are recorded.

  • React, don't rate

    Skin conductance reveals arousal that participants may not report, or even notice.

  • Express, don't explain

    Expressions and attention to the task are logged while the participant works.

Vision and mission

Vision

Research-grade experiments within every psychology student's reach, in India and around the world.

Measuring the mind in full resolution, not just ticks and timers.

Mission

We build low-cost, sensor-based instruments and validated protocols, by psychologists, for psychologists.

  1. Design affordable devices, with custom builds for any paradigm

  2. Validate every protocol for reliability and validity before release

  3. Train faculty and students to run, analyse and extend their own experiments

Validation is our process before release. No protocol has completed it yet.

Why psychologists are building this

Lab devices often begin with a sensor, then look for a use. We begin with the construct and the protocol, then choose the sensor.

  • Measurement comes first

    Reliability, validity and norms are part of the design from the start.

  • Designed for real practicals

    We teach and research in psychology, so we design for how practicals actually run.

  • Signals students can read

    Each signal is tied to a construct, so it is more than a raw trace on a screen.

  • Ethics by design

    Consent templates and privacy-aware data handling are part of every protocol.

Founders

  • Dr. Kiran NC

    Founder, Associate Professor of Psychology

    Brings academic leadership and curriculum knowledge.

  • Shouvik Sarkar

    Co-Founder, Research Scholar in Psychology

    Brings psychometrics and hands-on experiment building.

Roadmap

The order of work, from where we are now.

  1. Discover We are here

    Interview faculty and heads of department, and settle the three launch protocols.

  2. Prototype

    Build first working devices for Go/No-Go, Stroop and Mental Rotation.

  3. Validate

    Pilot with undergraduate students under ethics approval, and check reliability and validity against standard versions of each task.

  4. Beta

    Trial the instruments and the first software version in pilot departments.

  5. Launch

    Open the Starter Lab for quote requests and submit the validation paper.

Talk to us

We would like to hear how your department teaches these practicals today, whether or not you need an instrument yet.